My Latest submit to SGC - Results - Tell me what u think

Vintagedeputy · #1 04-03-2025, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill77

Not to beat a dead horse, but the problem with the Skinner is that it is mis-cut. Just measure the boarder under the 1st B in Bob and compare it to the boarder under the s in Pirates. my guess is PSA would have graded it a 5 MC.

Agreed. The Skinner is most definitely miscut. Although slight, it is observable to the naked eye.

I’ve got to believe that the miscut caused the grade.

perezfan · #2 04-03-2025, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vintagedeputy

Agreed. The Skinner is most definitely miscut. Although slight, it is observable to the naked eye.

I�ve got to believe that the miscut caused the grade.

Then what about the multi-thousands of equally or more severely miscut cards that currently reside in slabs graded 5-7? Why would they turn a blind eye towards all of those, but not this Skinner?

Please post just one image of a card with a "Miscut" qualifier that resembles the Skinner in question. Very eager to see it.

Vintagedeputy · #3 04-03-2025, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perezfan

Then what about the multi-thousands of equally or more severely miscut cards that currently reside in slabs graded 5-7? Why would they turn a blind eye towards all of those, but not this Skinner?

Can�t answer that. Probably a question better posed to SGC

Quote:

Please post just one image of a card with a "Miscut" qualifier that resembles the Skinner in question. Very eager to see it.

I only look at cards graded by SGC, which doesn�t use qualifiers. Qualifiers are stupid. I don�t know of any PSA miscut examples, but I�m sure others can offer examples.

campyfan39 · #4 04-03-2025, 05:44 PM

I understand your frustration.

I got my first-ever submission back today, and I thought in general it was ok but not what I thought.

Two cards were so low I will keep them, They graded a 3. I have cracked them out, and there are no creases, stains etc. I'm baffled.

I also have a 58 Maris, that is the nicest one I have ever seen, and it got a 5. I'm posting on BST. I just don't understand it. I know it's subjective, but dang, some consistency in the same submission would be nice!

bobbyw8469 · #5 04-04-2025, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by campyfan39

I understand your frustration.

I got my first-ever submission back today, and I thought in general it was ok but not what I thought.

Two cards were so low I will keep them, They graded a 3. I have cracked them out, and there are no creases, stains etc. I'm baffled.

I also have a 58 Maris, that is the nicest one I have ever seen, and it got a 5. I'm posting on BST. I just don't understand it. I know it's subjective, but dang, some consistency in the same submission would be nice!

Let me know when you post the Maris. VERY interested!

jchcollins · #6 04-04-2025, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by campyfan39

I understand your frustration.

I just don't understand it. I know it's subjective, but dang, some consistency in the same submission would be nice!

At the end of the day, technical grading has nothing to do with eye appeal. Agreed that the perception of consistency would be nice, but when it�s not there - usually a mismatch between those two things is to blame.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
why would you submit 62 of these???	Peter_Spaeth	Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum	4	03-05-2018 12:21 PM
High Grade T218 Results on eBay; Some Pretty Strong Results	Exhibitman	Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum	4	08-28-2017 05:00 PM
Anyone looking to submit to PSA soon?	Joshchisox08	Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk	4	03-04-2016 10:58 AM
FS Latest PSA results 52B/54Scoop/Mantle etc.	TonyH	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	1	09-28-2014 11:27 AM
Submit T201's to SGC	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	2	03-21-2006 10:10 AM