SGC or PSA for minor card back issue?

[Belfast1933]

I have a high value vintage HOFer card that I will be submitting soon for grading. The card front looks great but there is a very small paper loss on the card back (looks like it was removed from a scrapbook)

Does anyone here have experience to share with submitting to SGC and PSA to compare which might be a bit more lenient on a card flaw like this?

Thx all

Jeff

[Vintagedeputy]

SGC for vintage, no question. Pics would be helpful though.

[sacentaur]

Originally Posted by Belfast1933

I have a high value vintage HOFer card that I will be submitting soon for grading. The card front looks great but there is a very small paper loss on the card back (looks like it was removed from a scrapbook)

Does anyone here have experience to share with submitting to SGC and PSA to compare which might be a bit more lenient on a card flaw like this?

Thx all

Jeff

I love cards like this that present great from the front but have just a small piece of paper off the back (saves me lots of money and still look great on display).

I have SGC examples and they are 1.5 (fair) whereas I’ve seen PSA examples as 1 (poor). YMMV

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by Belfast1933

I have a high value vintage HOFer card that I will be submitting soon for grading. The card front looks great but there is a very small paper loss on the card back (looks like it was removed from a scrapbook)

Does anyone here have experience to share with submitting to SGC and PSA to compare which might be a bit more lenient on a card flaw like this?

Thx all

Jeff

If looking to get something by a grading company I would try PSA. I had a NM/MT Babe Ruth Sanella with a speck of paper loss on the border and it got a VG+ 3 from SGC. The speck was so small it looked like someone just touched the card with an ultra fine tip grey sharpie.