Joe B. has sued Leland's (follow up to closed "beware" thread) - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
 Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
 Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
 Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions
Reload this Page Joe B. has sued Leland's (follow up to closed "beware" thread)
Register NEW Chat! Who's Chatting FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2025, 12:37 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34,240
Default
First reference I have seen to the separate Standard Note and Security Agreement with the forum selection clause, though I have not followed this closely. I guess I'll have to read the briefs if I really care to figure it out, but based on what Todd just said, it does seem the court could have found that Leland's waived the forum selection clause argument by previously claiming New York not New Jersey was the proper forum. Talk about a Catch 22.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 05-07-2025 at 12:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2025, 12:57 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,001
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
First reference I have seen to the separate Standard Note and Security Agreement with the forum selection clause, though I have not followed this closely. I guess I'll have to read the briefs if I really care to figure it out, but based on what Todd just said, it does seem the court could have found that Leland's waived the forum selection clause argument by previously claiming New York not New Jersey was the proper forum. Talk about a Catch 22.
That's just it-- seems the NY court is going to honor the choice of forum clause rather than waive its enforcement, and is kicking the case over to New Jersey. I am not sure how much it matters, since the choice of NJ law provision will likely hold either way. I too am not about to read the file-- I just saw a couple of letters submitted to the Court by counsel and took them at face value.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal
Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable

If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2025, 10:04 PM
paul's Avatar
paul paul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,520
Default
I have an outside the courtroom update on this matter. One of the lots pulled from the Lelands auction because of this dispute was Tom Seaver's 1966 contract with Topps. I noticed that the same item very recently sold in Hunt's live auction. That was a pretty quick turnaround for the consignor to get the item to Hunt's. And I wonder if there was any disclosure to Hunt's about the dispute over this item. Or has Lelands agreed that it does not have the exclusive right to sell the items it pulled from its auction?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-19-2025, 04:23 PM
mannequin1 mannequin1 is offline
Ph.il Gr0dsky
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 90
Default
Has there been any resolution ?
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Follow up to I wonder.....thread larietrope Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 2 05-29-2021 05:56 PM
How to sell sued baseballs Jeff45 Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports 4 07-28-2019 07:26 PM
Getting sued for helping out Pup6913 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 36 06-13-2012 09:41 AM
E90-2 Wagner follow up thread Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 11 10-10-2007 02:42 PM
meant to follow up on the Wagner thread-- Context Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 12 09-06-2005 07:37 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 AM.

RSS - Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top

ebay GSB