Does PSA give favoritism to certain dealers/customers?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Hankphenom

Huh?

The answer to Phil's question has nothing to do with the answer to the OP's question. Phil himself said it was a completely different question. You are drawing a false inconsistency in post 100. Sorry if my prior post was not clear.

[toledo_mudhen]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

The answer to Phil's question has nothing to do with the answer to the OP's question. Phil himself said it was a completely different question. You are drawing a false inconsistency in post 100. Sorry if my prior post was not clear.

Fallacies of Inconsistency

Fallacies of inconsistency are cases where something inconsistent, self-contradictory or self-defeating is presented.

ie: - “One thing that we know for certain is that nothing is ever true or false.” – If there is something we know for certain, then there is at least one truth that we know. So it can’t be the case that nothing is true or false.

[Hankphenom]

Just seemed to me that if the big boys were calling the shots on grading in general, they would certainly be calling them on the cards on which they make the most money for themselves and their clients. Where's the inconsistency there?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Hankphenom

Just seemed to me that if the big boys were calling the shots on grading in general, they would certainly be calling them on the cards on which they make the most money for themselves and their clients. Where's the inconsistency there?

There's no point debating this further. If you choose to believe it's a level playing field, may the force be with you.

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Hankphenom

Just seemed to me that if the big boys were calling the shots on grading in general, they would certainly be calling them on the cards on which they make the most money for themselves and their clients. Where's the inconsistency there?

There are two groups of submitters described here. You are using data from the masses to disprove results of the few.