Change to PSA's operating procedures

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Knightlax5

I assume because they don't care. I figure they would want to remove it for those lower pop item, both modern and vintage.

I'll vote for the guess that they don't really care about SGC pop counts. Part of it could also be a function that SGC's database seems like it's not exactly state of the art, so it could be exciting to attempt to go in and deactivate a cert.

[Knightlax5]

Originally Posted by raulus

I'll vote for the guess that they don't really care about SGC pop counts. Part of it could also be a function that SGC's database seems like it's not exactly state of the art, so it could be exciting to attempt to go in and deactivate a cert.

From my understanding the de-certification process for SGC is very difficult. You need to be the original submitter for the card and send in the label. Which doesn’t make sense to me. If someone sent it into to SGC, why would they then turn it around and submit to PSA after the card returned? Someone please correct me if my understanding is off

[4815162342]

Originally Posted by Knightlax5

From my understanding the de-certification process for SGC is very difficult. You need to be the original submitter for the card and send in the label. Which doesn’t make sense to me. If someone sent it into to SGC, why would they then turn it around and submit to PSA after the card returned? Someone please correct me if my understanding is off

I took a small stack of SGC flips with me to Cleveland last year and was told they didn’t update the pop reports to remove cards that have been cracked out.