NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-14-2025, 11:13 AM
paul's Avatar
paul paul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,513
Default "1967" Topps StandUps

The big, black Topps StandUp set has always been listed as a 1967 issue. But the Jim Hunter card in the set lists him with the Oakland A's. The A's didn't move to Oakland until 1968. Doesn't this definitively establish the date of the set as 1968 (or later)? Here's an example of the Hunter card from Memory Lane's auction last night, clearly listing Hunter with Oakland: https://bid.memorylaneinc.com/bids/b...e?itemid=90543. Has this obvious mis-dating of the set really gone unnoticed for all these years?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2025, 01:32 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,098
Default

That is amazing. Good catch. TradingCardDataBase has a pic of the Hunter printed as Oakland but has it listed as Kansas City.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-14-2025, 03:05 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,984
Default

Apparently this has been known for a little while:
https://sabrbaseballcards.blog/2022/...-dont-deliver/

Maybe they were produced in 1967 after the A's move was announced in October. I don't know when it became clear to Topps that they could not use the Astros name but those Wynn and Staub standups with totally black caps (no logo) were likely considered unattractive, or at least less attractive than using a full color poster like what Topps went with in '68.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal
Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable

If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President.

Last edited by nolemmings; 09-14-2025 at 04:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2025, 05:44 PM
ALBB's Avatar
ALBB ALBB is offline
Albert Bee
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,404
Default words

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolemmings View Post
Apparently this has been known for a little while:
https://sabrbaseballcards.blog/2022/...-dont-deliver/

Maybe they were produced in 1967 after the A's move was announced in October. I don't know when it became clear to Topps that they could not use the Astros name but those Wynn and Staub standups with totally black caps (no logo) were likely considered unattractive, or at least less attractive than using a full color poster like what Topps went with in '68.


Wow, I never knew they were the exact words to that Supertramp song !... thats a lot of strong stuff there !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-15-2025, 06:52 AM
Kevvyg1026 Kevvyg1026 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 652
Default 1967 Topps stand ups

The 1968 poster set still has the ugly airbrush jobs on Hunter, Howard (although not so bad on the blue helmet), Wynn, and Staub. In addition, Wynn and Staub are the only two that have the city name rather than the team name.

I admit to being surprised (confused?) by the airbrush job on the Houston players. I thought the conflict about the Colt 45s vs Astros had been resolved in 1965.

The 1967 Astros had "Astros" on the front of their home jerseys. The 1967 Topps cards, while showing most players in the road uniforms (with Houston on the front) do show a couple of players (Sonny Jackson, Jim Landis) in the home Astros uniform.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-15-2025, 10:27 AM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevvyg1026 View Post
The 1968 poster set still has the ugly airbrush jobs on Hunter, Howard (although not so bad on the blue helmet), Wynn, and Staub. In addition, Wynn and Staub are the only two that have the city name rather than the team name.

I admit to being surprised (confused?) by the airbrush job on the Houston players. I thought the conflict about the Colt 45s vs Astros had been resolved in 1965.

The 1967 Astros had "Astros" on the front of their home jerseys. The 1967 Topps cards, while showing most players in the road uniforms (with Houston on the front) do show a couple of players (Sonny Jackson, Jim Landis) in the home Astros uniform.
As I understand it, the dispute was not with the Colt 45's but with Monsanto, which claimed it had trademarked the term with its "Astroturf" and was entitled to a piece of the licensing/royalty pie. Topps apparently wanted to steer clear of that "turf" war.

I never totally got why the hats were airbrushed, an "H" over a star. I don't believe that was claimed to be a trademarked logo by Monsanto, and although astro is one translation of star in Spanish, it seemed like a stretch for Topps to worry about that-- then again I am no student of the matter.

Back to the standups-- the ones of Staub and Wynn almost look like they're wearing visors, with their blacked-out hats blending into the cards' totally black background. As for the posters, the Astro logo still snuck onto Wynn's-- the player in the background shows it quite noticeably on his sleeve.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal
Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable

If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-16-2025, 08:53 AM
Kevvyg1026 Kevvyg1026 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 652
Default 1967 standups

How were the stand-ups sold? Were they in packs like the plax ?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-16-2025, 11:33 AM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevvyg1026 View Post
How were the stand-ups sold? Were they in packs like the plax ?
I could be wrong but I don’t think they were sold to the public, if they were they would have been in those plain white wrappers at a few select stores in the Northeast as a test market.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-16-2025, 02:42 PM
toppcat's Avatar
toppcat toppcat is offline
Dave.Horn.ish
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,949
Default

They were sold in these test packs and also included instructions:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 67toppsstandupwrapperandinstructions.jpg (156.6 KB, 74 views)

Last edited by toppcat; 09-16-2025 at 02:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1967 Topps football card with misaligned "double struck" front (end 4/28) LuckyLarry Net54 Baseball Live $1 Auctions - Ending Sundays 8pm CST 5 04-23-2024 10:29 AM
1967 Topps high # "unofficial" price guide rsdill2 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 36 09-28-2017 07:04 AM
FOR TRADE: 1967 "Topps" Venezuelan Major League dupes NewEnglandBaseBallist 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 4 12-02-2016 10:19 PM
1967 Topps #150 Mickey Mantle PSA 5 EX "Dead Centered", sold mintacular 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 2 08-12-2015 06:04 AM
1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" mightyq 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 09-10-2014 01:28 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 PM.


ebay GSB