|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Amazing card but SGC was quite generous on the grade.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Best eye candy in the hobby.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree with the overgrading. PSA surely gives this a 1 in today’s world, depending on who submits it, of course. 😁
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
My guess is $12.5 million and obviously it sells
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
It will go for more than I can afford.
It wouldn't be close to a 3 today but the technical grade doesn't matter as much on a card like this. The eye appeal and awesomeness are hard to beat. .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Under $7.5mm. Specifically, $7.3mm.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
It still chaps my ass that SGC gave that a 3. If the grade doesn't matter, give it the 1 and call it a day. It's not worth the hit to their credibility to pretend that's a 3 on any planet.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, a complete joke. None of us would ever get a "3" if we submitted that card. It's a "1" all day long, and they don't even have the excuse of it being in an older slab.
__________________
Be sure to subscribe to my YouTube Channel, The Stuff Of Greatness. New videos are uploaded every week... https://www.youtube.com/@tsogreatness/videos |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobody who buys opinions gives a shit about the "credibility" of who they buy their opinions from.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't they grade "on the curve," though, according to the issue? I thought fragile cards like T-205s, subject to easy chipping, or cards like these released under treacherous circumstances, were granted leniency when it came to the numbers. No?
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree with Raulus, no sale. The reserve will be set too high. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree with Wise and Raulis…..this is a white whale grail of a card for the collector or investor who would sell this in less than 2 years unless they know they're gonna make a good profit. To me this card has more up side in the next 10-20 years than any other card including the Wagner T206
Last edited by Johnny630; 09-29-2025 at 07:25 PM. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
The grading companies used to treat the 1914 Cracker Jacks with heavy caramel stains a bit more kindly, knowing they came in a box of sticky stuff. Don't believe that is the case anymore.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| $3 for a 1914 Baltimore News Babe Ruth pre-rookie card? | Vegas Cards | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 06-10-2021 07:52 AM |
| Babe Ruth Museum - 1914 Baltimore News | 25801wv | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-12-2019 12:02 AM |
| 1914 Baltimore News Babe Ruth Card | sports-rings | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 12-08-2012 03:45 PM |
| 1914 Baltimore News Babe Ruth Rookie Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-24-2008 05:25 PM |
| 1914 Babe Ruth Baltimore News card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 86 | 09-24-2005 12:36 PM |