 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-24-2002, 09:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
SGC grading questionable material??
Posted By: David
I'm not passing judgement at this moment on SGC, as I've never seen in person a 71 Dell Stamp and don't know the exact nature of the performations. On the 60s Topps and Bazooka stamps, the perforations are as bold as the spines on on the back of a Dinosauer. It appears the Dell perforations are more subtle, like a line of ants at a picnic. Either way, I beleive the perforations are best left in tack, at least as long as they keep away from potato salad. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC graded 1960 material | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 0 | 02-21-2009 09:11 PM |
| N4: QUESTIONABLE AUTHENTICITY | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-04-2008 06:30 PM |
| Is this questionable behavior by an auctioneer? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 02-01-2006 04:39 PM |
| questionable purchase much? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-22-2005 06:31 PM |
| Questionable Old Judge | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-08-2002 07:20 PM |
Hybrid Mode
