|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: T206Monsta
I can understand the dislike for PSA but I think the relative number of cards graded is a factor. I would guess just from volume on "the bay" and in the various periodicals that PSA is the industry leader in market share for grading. Therefore, they would have the most mistakes as they have a greater chance of making mistakes. SGC is great but I'm sure we can find msitakes of theirs. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My PSA Experiment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 05-01-2008 07:17 PM |
| PRO Grading... you've seen the 9's and 10's -- PRO .5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-07-2007 06:58 AM |
| My experiment on the BST | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-03-2007 05:24 PM |
| Grading Co. Experiment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-13-2005 12:34 PM |
| My $1,000 Experiment: How to Spend? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-16-2005 08:10 PM |