 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
08-21-2004, 10:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quality vs Quantity
Posted By: Anonymous
For me it's easy, quantity, since I am trying to put to gether a player set of one card from every major leaguer that appeared on a card from 1908-1945. This will involve over 9,000 cards, so my grade requirements are nominal. I look for cards with no heavy crease or paper loss on the face and name legible. Otherwise, paper loss, other creases, round corners and even chunks of the card missing are perfectly fine by me. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quality versus Quantity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-02-2009 09:47 AM |
| anyone ever see the quality of these?? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 03-22-2008 08:29 PM |
| WTB: Quantity of 1952 Reprints Dick Gernert | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 07-20-2007 08:33 AM |
| What kind of collector are you? (Quality or Quantity) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 44 | 12-10-2006 09:13 AM |
| A quality Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-12-2004 11:09 PM |
Threaded Mode