![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
That is a darn nice card and would be 1 or 2 grades higher w/o the paperloss. SGC clobbers you for paperloss and writing. PSA maybe only drops a grade or 2 for this. I know some marks and writing get close to a full grade with a "MK" qualifier. I actually like PSA's approach on this better. If the card is GEM with a pen mark, grade it 1 grade lower and state "MK". Instead of putting a no crease, sharp corner, well centered card in a 1 holder. I have had to pop a few SGC cards and sell them raw due to this. Just my opinion. Dan. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 05:17 PM |
chipping vs. paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-12-2007 03:55 PM |
1933 and '34 World Wide Gum cards with paper loss on eBay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-24-2006 10:12 AM |
paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |
Crease or paper loss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-01-2003 07:10 PM |