|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: Josh K.
T206's explanation makes the most sense and is what I have always understood with respect to soaking - if you bleach/soak to clean (which ordinary water typically wont do) it will be rejected if discovered (bleaching, of course, will also leave a distinct odor). The slip will also state that the card was soaked/cleaned as the reason for rejection (mine did not). |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SOLD - High-Grade 1909 Ramly (T204) - Tim Murnane HOF Rookie Card (SGC 60) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-30-2008 06:21 PM |
| High Grade Sale '64 SGC 84 Yaz; '68 SGC 86 Seaver; '57 SGC 80 Yanks; '67 SGC 84 BrockFlood | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-23-2007 10:05 AM |
| I thought SGC didn't grade restored card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 09-28-2005 01:32 AM |
| Will SGC grade an E103 Williams Caramel card if | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-31-2004 03:16 PM |
| Answer to how little of a card SGC will grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-08-2002 12:20 PM |