![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Another factor, and I apologize if it was already mentioned, is that I think SGC has become stricter over time. If that is so, and I think there is solid support for this theory including the fact that SGC will not automatically reholder its "older" cards, then that makes it even more difficult to make comparisons based on aggregate pop report numbers. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1934 Goudey PSA/SGC | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 04-08-2009 09:28 PM |
1934 Goudey 17 card lot - PSA & SGC Graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-01-2009 07:59 PM |
Killer PSA 4 Cy Young (Glove Showing) and Low Pop PSA 7 '38 Goudey Rudy York ends in 3 hrs | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2008 10:04 AM |
SGC and PSA T206 pop report comparisons 2006 and 2008 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-03-2008 05:06 PM |
1934 Goudey fans may find this interesting... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 02-09-2006 04:58 PM |