 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
09-24-2005, 02:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Rookie debate Part 2......Cobb
Posted By: jay behrens
I agree, I don't have a problem considering a post card and baseball "card". This is actually the size limitation for my set. I think anything bigger than a post card a you move into the area of what would be considered a premium and not a true card. And yes, I do not consider t3s cards, but I love them none the less and probably slip and call them cards, but by my defianition of a card, they are not. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Continuing the Ty Cobb/Ty Cobb back debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 92 | 01-31-2009 06:50 PM |
| Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 135 | 08-13-2007 12:10 AM |
| 1938 GOUDEY #4C part 1 JOE DIMAGGIO ROOKIE Card PRO 4.5 | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 5 | 07-10-2006 11:10 AM |
| Ty Cobb Rookie ?.....let's debate it . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 03-11-2006 07:15 PM |
| Cobb Rookie Photo on Ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-05-2004 04:05 PM |
Threaded Mode