![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scot Reader (ebay: sreader3)
For the record, I am a T206 collector who believes Kleinow (N.Y. Catching) is tougher than Kleinow (Boston). I have discussed this with a few others and know I am not alone in this view. In the 14,000+ transaction T206 survey I conducted on eBay between 2003 and 2005, there were 16 transactions involving Kleinow (Boston) and only 11 involving Kleinow (N.Y. Catching). This left the N.Y. version tied for 26th and the Boston version tied for 64th in terms of difficulty. I realize this is not an irrefutable sample but neither is it trivial. I don't think the relative difficulty has much to do with series--some T206 subjects are just more difficult than others. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: RARE T206 RARE BACKS | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 21 | 11-18-2008 07:37 AM |
Looking for T206 Rare Backs | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-10-2006 09:34 AM |
T206 Rare Backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-10-2006 05:08 AM |
Some more T206 Rare Backs | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 12-11-2005 06:38 PM |
t206 Hofer's w/rare backs vs. Commons w/rare backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 02-03-2003 10:39 AM |