|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: Dave Hornish
Thanks Ted Z, I indeed read the Plank thread when it was running and found it very informative. I guess I've been mulling it ever since. I find Wagner and Plank in T206 to be curiouser and curiouser and a couple of others less so but still interesting. The mystery part is great: possible deception on the non Sweet Cap poses for Plank and Wagner violates the primacy of Piedmont theory, which I subscribe to (as do the St Louis variations of Demmitt and O'Hara, of course). Could Plank have replaced Wagner on whatever sheet Honus was originally on before being pulled as well? Why did this even matter to the ATC and American Litho? Great stuff, these questions. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My T206 Plank theory....New Follow-up info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 12-18-2020 01:14 PM |
| The enigmatic T206 350/460 series....theory, checklist & backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 02-11-2009 01:38 PM |
| My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 12:43 PM |
| Angle theory? Why did Grandpa only collect HOFers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 08-13-2005 07:51 AM |
| My theory on the Four Base Hits King Kelly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-28-2002 01:09 PM |