|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: Richard
Guys, I agree that it is absurd to consider the 1933 Goudey Ruth to be the rookie card. What gives Beckett the authority to make that decision? It simply dosen't make sense. Common sense tells you that something that sounds irrational usually is. This is sheer nonsense. If Beckett considers the 1933 Goudey his rookie then I say that his 1916 M101-5 is his minor league rookie card. Makes about as much sense. Give me a break and wake up Beckett. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1949 Hage's Dairy Billy Martin | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 10-06-2013 04:55 PM |
| Billy Martin and George Steinbrenner | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 04-08-2009 05:27 PM |
| 1952 Topps BILLY MARTIN & PHIL RIZZUTO - PSA 6 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-03-2008 12:10 PM |
| FT -- 1952 Topps #175 Billy Martin RC PSA 6 (TRADED) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-26-2008 10:03 AM |
| Kahn's Billy Martin | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-22-2007 04:52 PM |