|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: leon
I agree completely. No way they are proofs. Just like no way are the E97 black and whites proofs. For any grading company to continue to label them that way (even though guides might reference them that way) is wrong, imho. So many times it's easy to take the short way and not do the homework. I too believe it is a seperate series from everything I know today...I think they are still cool cards...but definitely not proofs....best regards |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1940 Play Ball "Color Proofs" finally graded! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 04-30-2019 02:26 PM |
| T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 07:28 PM |
| E254 Colgan's "Home Run" Baker ***SOLD*** | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 03-08-2008 07:27 AM |
| 1970-71 Topps Super "Proofs" | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 12-14-2007 07:54 PM |
| Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 02:23 PM |