 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
07-07-2007, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Would someone explain to me why one of these cards has a qualifier and the other does not?
Posted By: JimB
Bottom centering is a bit ambiguous on T206s (and other issues). This Speaker may be an extreme example, but the question of whether or not or how much of the border area with the name should be considered border area is tough. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cards with a "mk" qualifier (owner's stamp) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-21-2009 02:05 PM |
| PSA OC for Lower Grade without Qualifier? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 08-02-2008 10:06 AM |
| MC Qualifier on rare card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-21-2007 04:38 PM |
| PSA qualifier & pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-20-2002 01:38 AM |
| How did they miss the PD qualifier on this one? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-25-2002 05:16 PM |
Threaded Mode