 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
12-19-2007, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Any 33 Goudey experts out there?
Posted By: Eric Brehm
My #71 Burke and #88 Rollings both measure 2.3625 inches in width, i.e. 1/80th (0.0125) inch shorter than the nominal 2 3/8 (2.375) inches. So in my sample (based on rounding off to the nearest 1/80th inch), where I found that cards are 0.01 inch shorter than expected on average, that deviation for those two particular cards is in fact about average. But I don't have other Burke and Rollings cards to compare them to. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any S74 experts out there? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-19-2008 08:16 AM |
| Need Some Help From The Experts!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-24-2006 12:42 PM |
| 1933 Goudey experts - need help !!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-09-2005 06:07 AM |
| What do the experts think of this one? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-10-2003 02:35 PM |
| Experts, please have a look... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 02-15-2003 08:03 PM |
Threaded Mode