 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
03-22-2009, 06:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Scan "Fixing"
Posted By: Matt
I appreciate all of the well thought out responses. What I was hoping for is that we would come to consensus on objective guidelines for what is and isn't allowed (analogous to the unwritten hobby rules about not doctoring cards). It seems everyone agrees that enhancing scans to make the cards look better then they actually are is a problem, but most also have no problem enhancing scans if it gives a more accurate representation of the card. The end result, is that there isn't an objective standard of what type of enhancements are or are not OK (i.e. enhancing sharpness is a no-no), but rather it is about intent. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1929 R316 "Kashin Publications" Babe Ruth with "MADE IN U.S.A" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2022 02:27 PM |
| T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
| John "Rowdy Jack" Joseph "Peach Pie" O'Connor ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-17-2005 11:58 AM |
| Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
| Ben guessed the "1452". MW ( vaguely) guessed the "sjowall."" " | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-22-2003 06:57 PM |
Threaded Mode