|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it would be a 20 but could get a 10. If it gets a 30 I would be very surprised. Just my opinion but I am usually pretty close...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would guess a 20, outside shot at a 30
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree that an SGC 20 would be the most likely grade. With the paper loss, although minimal, taken into account, even if the stain were removed I doubt it would grade higher than a 30 and for a relatively unknown player, it would probably not be worth the cost of professional restoration.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sgc 10
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Phil, no offense but Patsy Donovan is not a nobody. His stats are better than many that have been enshrined in Cooperstown. He is one of the greatest of the early Irish ballplayers with over 2250 hits and a lifetime .300 hitter.
-Rhett
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
SGC 10, if an attempt wasn't made at cleaning the thing. Nice card
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks for all the replies guys. i wouldn't call patsy donovan a nobody either, guy had a very solid career. the card is gorgeous if not for that damned stain. the tiny bit of paper loss doesn't bother me. i posted because i'm at a crossroads in respect to getting the card graded or just leaving it be. the over sized holders are expensive. what do you guys think?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you are planning on holding on to it, I'd just leave it be and save the money.
|
![]() |
|
|