 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-15-2009, 06:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
See my paragraph one just above.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets 
|
|
#2
05-15-2009, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the record I was asked to be sent this email from Elkins he had Dan McKee forward on his thoughts about something and he just happened to foward on this email to me.
This email was addressed to me not sent under the table....
|
|
#3
05-15-2009, 07:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am sure all of us have said things in emails that, if taken out of context and published on message boards, would not make us look pretty. This is not to excuse Kevin (although I continue to be highly skeptical he actually did anything along the lines he was speaking about) but to make a broader point that I don't think people should publish private emails, even if their intentions are good.
|
|
#4
05-15-2009, 07:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am not condemning John by any means, I understand this is a matter on which people have legitimate differences of opinion, I am merely stating my own.
|
|
#5
05-15-2009, 07:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets
|
|
#6
05-15-2009, 07:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
In this particular case, sure, but that doesn't change my view of the wisdom of the rule (which this forum has) against publication.
And I quote Things you can not post about Personal information about people including but not limited to: Phone numbers, addresses, email addresses, etc, unless given permission ...Personal emails should not be posted on the board. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 05-15-2009 at 07:20 PM. Reason: add text of rule
|
|
#7
05-15-2009, 07:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Except it wasn't a private email that was published; it was an email that was released by Elkins to someone other than the sender.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets
|
|
#8
05-15-2009, 07:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Did Kevin authorize it to be released? If not, he still has an expectation of privacy which HE did not waive.
|
|
#9
05-15-2009, 07:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
an analogy
I write something to my lawyer, in confidence. The lawyer breaches the privilege and forwards it to a third party. The third party, knowing the original communication was intended to remain confidential, nevertheless publishes it without my permission. I have no right to be POd at the third party, as well as my lawyer?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
