 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-15-2009, 09:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Ordinarily I wouldn't be in favor of posting emails, but when it's for the benefit of the hobby that the information be shared I think an exception should be made. Of course at the same time, I'm glad that I don't have to make the call as to where the "benefit of the hobby" line gets drawn.
|
|
#2
05-15-2009, 09:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agree with Spaeth, again
and don't know why, since he's a Boston guy
 Not real comfortable with any of this, but disclosing the e-mail is up there on the discomfort list. It's not a legal question of privilege at all--there is none, at least as relates to private dissemination. I still find it rather disquieting. DISCLAIMER: I reserve the right to edit and erase, as I just watched Joe Nathan gag away a rare Twins road win in the 9th. Good thing I love the Yankees too, or someone would pay, and I don't mean the 12 (now far less than 12) bottled soldiers who have done their dury.
|
|
#3
05-15-2009, 10:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I'd say disclosing the email makes me less uncomfortable than reading Kevin's admission that he altered cards and defrauded Net 54 members. That made me closer to nauseous.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets
|
|
#4
05-15-2009, 10:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
well
imagine my surprise that you take that stand, Jeff, and that you couch it in terms of sarcasm. I assume there is room for disagreement here, and that others have a right to their opinions, but I have no great faith in that assumption either.
|
|
#5
05-15-2009, 10:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Todd, imagine my surprise that you'd take my serious comment and presume the worst. i was being serious; reading Kevin discuss targeting Net 54 members with fraud was sickening -- especially when he stated that he was disappointed that he didn't defraud me. Was that supposed to make me happy?
And who said there is no room for disagreement? Has this thread been shut down just because some people disagree with the fact that Kevin's private admission of fraud was revealed?
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets
|
|
#6
05-15-2009, 10:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mark VL
I agree that in most cases, disclosing someone else's email is bad form. But if it is done to expose a crime or something nefarious and damaging, then I think judgment has to be exercised---and it was. Good. Generally speaking, of course I prefer that my private emails stay that way. But I try to remember not to send anything in an email that I wouldn't be willing to be seen by everyone at my workplace--or across the internet, for that matter. If I always lived up to that principle, it would make all my emails relatively boring. But it would also give me an incentive to be a more accurate and clever writer.
|
|
#7
05-15-2009, 10:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let me go on the record....
If you admit to a crime or hint that you will be working on even more crimes and you send that on into cyberspace. If said email ever hits my inbox with my name attahced to it it will be made of public record for everyone to see either on here or I will make my own site to share the information with the collecting community. If you email me call me names, say I have funny hair, you hate Leon or Jeff or belong to dirty websites...I will never post or let anyone know as that does not belong on this board. Really pretty simple dont be a crook dont lie about being a crook and your emails are 100% safe.... Some of you guys amaze me I guess in the future I'll wait untill you get ripped off....then I'll pop up oh by the way funny thing a few years ago I knew about this....LOL John
|
|
#8
05-15-2009, 10:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wonka
You have funny hair? wow 
|
|
#9
05-15-2009, 10:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Max please dont post personal pictures!
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
