|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Alan,
You make a good point. The best person to direct those questions to is Mr. Garo himself. I can only tell you of my experiences. He's no rubber stamp for anyone and unlike most authenticators does not buy or sell autographs. He's turned down a lot of autographs from me and fellow collectors and explained in detail why and sent exemplars he got from the Halper Collection and the HOF. Martin Green |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd like to add my two cents re the Ruth autograph. It looks good to me but I make no claims to being an expert.
Martin Green |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I will refrain from.commenting on the posted example but can say without any doubt that I have seen highly qustionable items authenticated by this person. I would proceed with extreme caution...
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
David,
I have a quick question that this thread reminded me of. Using a Ruth autographed photo as a medium and assuming that the signatures were genuine, is there an appreciable difference in what one could expect to pay btw a signed photo of The Babe in uniform (Yankees) and one of him in street clothes? Jeff |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
First off, anyone can come here with a fake name and disrespect people. That was my point when I used the word "troll".
Second, how much is the asking price for this piece, if I may ask? Items authenticated by...well, those whose certs were photographed on the HBO Real Sports episode is usually sold quite cheaply. A bargain! Lastly, 8x10 signed photos in baseball garb usually fetches $3,500+ and civilian clothing, maybe $2,000-2,500 depends on uniqueness. Dan Last edited by danc; 06-09-2009 at 11:42 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mr. Bluebirds,
I was just curious as to what convinced you to use Mr. Garo for your authentication needs? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mr McMurry
I used Mr Garo because I heard good things about him and have never been disappointed. Whether my items have been good or bad, he thoroughly explains why. Have had no trouble selling with his cert. Despite the negative comments, not one "expert" or even "pseudo expert" has come forward and said the Ruth signature is bad. This forum has some fine enlightened members who are fair, honorable and knowledgeable. But as with any group there are always a few who have there own agenda and get great pleasure ripping someone's name and reputation based on rumor, innuendo and just plain lies. I guess it's easier to curse the darkness then light a candle and seek the truth. |
![]() |
|
|