NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2009, 07:31 PM
springpin springpin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 196
Default

Since I did the book I have come across this style of pin. I have 2-3 of them, as I recall, but not of this player. They are all slightly larger in diameter than the traditional large PM10 pins. Like many pins, they raise more questions than they answer. Here are some of them:
1. The most distinguishing characteristic of these pins is they feature an "action shot" of the player. I can't recall other pins like that.
2. The name of the player is not in block letters, but in script (presumably the player's autograph). Unusual, but not unique, as a series of early color pins from the late '60s or early '70s (about 3.25" in diameter) had the same feature.
3. None of the players were the stars of the era, or even their own team.

These pins are not reproductions. Who would make these pins, why were they made, and how would they be acquired? Possibly as a premium along with some purchase, but premiums typically have small diameters. Sold as souvenirs at stadiums? Quite possibly, but why have more of these pins not surfaced before? How did these players get selected for production? Wouldn't Mel Ott or Carl Hubbell have greater sales appeal? Does anyone recognize the image of this player from a baseball card?

There are basically two ways to trace the evolution of a pin: 1) production to distribution (sales); or 2) vice versa. Both halves of the puzzle have to "fit" each other. I generally prefer the second way, i.e., first trying to understand why this pin would have been made, and the likely context for its distribution. Alternatively, you could start with the production end (e.g., the union bug), and then try to fathom the who, why, when, and where, given you are holding the "what".

I have no concrete reason to conclude these pins are fantasies. But the answers to the questions raised would go a very long way toward understanding the origin of these pins. Furthermore, who is to say that a union worker on his lunch break in 1938 who used the manufacturing process in the factory to produce a few pins of his favorite players has contributed something of less appeal than commissioned pins sold by vendors at a ballpark?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2009, 07:44 PM
springpin springpin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 196
Default Cleveland Indians pins

Rob,

I have always been intrigued why there were two designs for these pins; a star vs. Chief Wahoo at the 4 o'clock and 8 o'clock positions. You have two players (Avila and Hegan) in both designs. Do you believe these two designs represent two different years of production? If not across-year production, any idea as to the basis of the two designs within the same year? Another wonderful pin mystery!

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2009, 08:17 PM
Rob D. Rob D. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,422
Default

Hi Paul,

Nice to see you posting again.

The questions you bring up about this series are similar to ones that I've kicked around countless times with Indians collectors at shows here in Ohio. I do think we're looking at series from two different years, but if we accept that as a fact, it just leads to more questions.

Why issue new poses of Avila and Hegan, popular players to be sure but not on the same level as Boudreau? One theory I have that kind of holds water is that the "star" series was issued first, because the pose of Avila isn't just a head shot but rather one from his waist up, which is different from all of the other poses in both series. So that might explain why a new pose -- one of the more typical head shot -- was used in the second year for the "Wahoo" series. Unfortunately, that doesn't explain why a new pose of Hegan was used, because both are head shots.

The other thing that has bugged me is why examples like Boudreau, Mitchell and Rosen border on being common, but the Wynn and the one pose of Hegan are really, really tough. The reason it bugs me is that somewhere I have an ad from a team-issued publication (and, of course, I can't put my hands on it right now) that shows these very pins being offered for sale. So that always has led me to believe they simply could be purchased, as opposed to being part of a seasonlong giveaway or promotion. Unfortunately, the ad pictures only a generic drawing of a pin -- exact enough to positively conclude that its for this series but generic enough that you can't make out a star or Wahoo to determine the year of issue. Argh!

Another reason I think the "Wahoo" series came second is because that pose of Avila is used in the 1.25-inch series pictured below, which based on the players I've seen, likely was issued third. It would make little sense to go back and use an earlier pose of Avila for this third series -- but I suppose that can't be ruled out entirely, can it?

Like you say, lots of unanswered questions and fun, little mysteries.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg avila-1_5.jpg (24.3 KB, 272 views)
File Type: jpg rosen-1_5.jpg (19.7 KB, 270 views)
File Type: jpg simpson-1_5.jpg (7.0 KB, 269 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-18-2009, 07:46 AM
smokelessjoe's Avatar
smokelessjoe smokelessjoe is offline
Shawn England
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dawsonville, Ga
Posts: 644
Default

"Boost the City League" pin. And though not a pin, I thought I would post this Ty Cobb pocket mirror...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg booster.jpg (57.7 KB, 255 views)
File Type: jpg front.jpg (70.1 KB, 254 views)
File Type: jpg back 1.jpg (71.5 KB, 254 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-18-2009, 04:52 PM
ksfarmboy's Avatar
ksfarmboy ksfarmboy is offline
Clint
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,446
Default

My favorites.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Item_5092_1.jpg (26.4 KB, 231 views)
File Type: jpg cbut.jpg (24.4 KB, 236 views)
__________________
Buying Kansas CDVs, Cabinets, RPPCs and other pre 1930 memorabilia.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-17-2009, 07:49 PM
batsballsbases's Avatar
batsballsbases batsballsbases is offline
Al
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: From Ct+ NY now retired in North Carolina
Posts: 2,220
Default pins

Paul,
Just curious do any of the pins you have that look like this ,scripted have a union logo on the back?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:59 PM
springpin springpin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 196
Default

Al,

Took me awhile to find the pins in question. What I have realized is all the pins are of Reds players. Yours, mine, and another one held by a third person. Perhaps just a coincidence that only Reds pins have surfaced, but probably not. The Reds were NL Champions in 1939 and 1940. These dates correspond to when the players on these pins played for the Reds. Perhaps they were issued in association with the team's success in that time period. In any event, your question has prompted me to conclude there is an older starting point in the history for the large PM10 pins.

Ciao,

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2009, 03:31 PM
batsballsbases's Avatar
batsballsbases batsballsbases is offline
Al
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: From Ct+ NY now retired in North Carolina
Posts: 2,220
Default pins

Paul,
I would conclude the same thing. It makes more sense that it would be a later date. Who would go thru the trouble and union stamp these pins as we said they arenot stars but common players. As you stated maybe the reds did a little package of these pins for the 39 world series. Who knows. But yes I do believe the larger PM10s were started later than the late 40s.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-25-2009, 11:54 AM
wrapperguy's Avatar
wrapperguy wrapperguy is offline
Jeff
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 413
Default Great thread

Fabulous items guys!

I love press pins. Here are a couple faves from pre and post war:

17 Chisox WS.jpg 1917 White Sox with ribbon

23 NY WS.jpg 1923 New York

27 Pgh WS.jpg 1927 Pittsburgh

58 NYY WS proto 1.jpg 1958 Yankee prototype

61 NYY WS proto.jpg 1961 Yankee prototype
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-25-2009, 08:34 PM
Dave4Reds Dave4Reds is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 40
Default Reds Press Pins

Those were some great press pins. How did you come by the prototypes? Those must be incredibly rare. Here are a few from my collection.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Reds - Press Pins2.jpg (45.4 KB, 113 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 PM.


ebay GSB