|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Come on guys....me "confused" on the 1910 COUPON's ! ? ![]() I'm one of the few collector's here that contend that these cards are really the 16th basic T206 T-brand. I guess I better get my calipers and micrometer and measure my two cards.......either that, or I have two very unusual Type 1 cards. TED Z |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ted,
I'm with you that Coupon's are the 16th brand, but I still think they are thinner. - Jon
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know you agree with me on this subject; however, I think you and I are in the minority on this forum.
These cards were printed simultaneously with the regular 350 Series T206's in 1910. The 68 cards in this set are 350 Series Subjects. Their back design is virtually identical with the Am. Bty, Broad Leaf, Cycle and Drum issues. All my research into the 1910 COUPON cards virtually proves my argument that it indeed a T206 issue. ........1910 COUPON................T213 type 2.................T213 type 3 ![]() ![]() As for the debate on the thickness of the cardboard stock; as I said, I'll measure my COUPON and a T206 with a micrometer and report back to you. TED Z |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually I think most on this forum agree with you about the T213-1 being a type of T206....though I am not one of them....but only for the reason that I don't think changing the ACC is a good thing. But besides that debate the T213-1's are thinner. You don't need to get any calipers or measuring devices. They feel like they are almost paper thin. I have probably handled around 30-50 type 1's (raw) and all have been the same. There is no need to debate the thickness issue, imo.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
My T213-1's are definitely thinner than any T206 that I own. They are thinner than any Tobbacco card that I own including T210,T211,T206, etc...
I have handled several raw ones and I will never forget the first one I handled. It told me a lot about why these types are so scarce and why if one is in VG condition, you are holding a high condition Coupon... They are down right flimsy... Here some more boilerplate for you... I just checked the POP report for PSA and that report tells you all you need to know about the condition sensitivity... Highest Graded Type 1 Coupon is graded a "4." (That's right, a 4, no typo...) SGC does not break out Coupon's by Type 1, 2, or 3 so who knows with their POP report !?!?
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia Last edited by DixieBaseball; 07-10-2009 at 06:20 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Macrae and I just discussed these cards......and, it appears that I have at least one 1910 COUPON
that is thicker than most. Mark and I will be set up at the National and I will bring this card to the Show. TED Z |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The other T cards as thin would be T216 Virginia Extra and whatever the Derby Cigarette cards are.
Last edited by Leon; 07-10-2009 at 07:33 PM. Reason: clarification |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Oliver Optics Magazine question | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 02-17-2008 01:17 PM |
| original hartland statue question? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 12-29-2007 06:55 PM |
| E93 color question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-03-2004 07:50 PM |
| Question about this Christy Mathewson item (scanned) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-20-2002 07:33 PM |
| T206 Ty Cobb Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-09-2002 01:21 PM |