|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I believe the opposite to be true.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
But what about the card that I listed from SCPs auction. I brought this up because it graded a 2 and it has more than a small amount of paper loss on the back.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
No way SGC gives that card a 30/2.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've seen SGC grade a nice card with paperloss a 40.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is one of those things that drives me NUTS about grading.
See below: a PSA 4 ![]() and an SGC 3 (back is centered and clean- no creases)
__________________
t205 midgrade and always looking for M101-2 Sporting News Supplements |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael- I believe in the case of the T205 Needham they simply missed the paper loss. I don't think that is an acceptable amount of loss for a VG-EX, but instead just sloppy grading. If the back were clean then it would accurately be a PSA 4.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I bought it on eBay with just a front scan and was pissed when it arrived. But for those in this thread that says PSA is tough on paper loss......they weren't on this card.
__________________
t205 midgrade and always looking for M101-2 Sporting News Supplements Last edited by Mrc32; 07-30-2009 at 08:50 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not to bash SGC, since they are an exemplary grading company (of course, that was before the Mastro fiasco), but.................this one is not mine anymore; here is an example of a graded SGC card, receiving a Vg/Ex grade with a tiny bit of paper loss on the back (towards the bottom).
![]() ![]() This one is not mine anymore as well, it resides in a SGC 70 holder (a tiny bit of paper loss on the back towards the top and middle). ![]() ![]() For the record I prefer SGC, and as Barry mentioned, mistakes happen and in my book PSA has more then its fair share of misgraded cards. Now, to get back to the original thread, if you send your Cobb card to get graded 100 times. In my opinion, the card will come back as a "ONE" 99 out of 100 times. Lovely Day... |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Needham is overgraded in the above case. PSA is wildly inconsistent when it comes to paper loss.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
| my new and improved 4-point grading scale | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-05-2009 06:43 AM |
| Consistent grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-25-2008 05:09 PM |
| chipping vs. paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-12-2007 03:55 PM |
| Interesting Story Concerning Card Trimming and Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-10-2002 05:43 PM |