 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
09-28-2009, 03:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
That sums it up
Frank, your description of "non-man made error" pretty much sums up my thoughts on what should or shouldn't be listed as a variation, though I've never used that terminology.
The 1956 Schmidt will not make the cut as a listed variation. A few cards, like the Herrer and the 1990T Frank Thomas no-name have been grandfathered because of their value/popularity. The T206s you mention are not included in the Standard Catalog set list for T206, but rather have a separate listing along with Sweeney no B, etc.
__________________
My (usually) vintage baseball/football card blog: http://boblemke.blogspot.com Link to my custom cards gallery: http://tinyurl.com/customcards 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1956 Aaron line variation??? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-31-2008 12:10 PM |
| 1956 Ford variation question | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 07-28-2008 08:02 AM |
| Errors & Variation Discoveries Thread | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 03-24-2008 09:04 PM |
| It is time for me to sell my 1956 Topps Master set to work on another quest | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 03-13-2007 06:41 AM |
Threaded Mode