A New T205 Variation.... It's Official Now.

Another ghost to chase around.

Everybody needs to feel important an kudos to who ever found a card with a misprint. The card was never corrected so it is not a variation. Kinda like the Doc White quotes no quotes variation. Only found on polar Bear cards and no corrected version. They should be listed as UER's and not variation's . I guess the other 2 cards mentioned in the DOC WHITE thread as well as the white will be the next 3 variations I give up. Whats next in this long exhausting journey.

I am a little pissed as now I have to explain to my wife I need another card for the set and that now it is going to be another over priced inflated card.

Maybe the new Latham card I have will be a variation also. I mean it has a W ghost printed on a back that is not known to have the W.A. version.

I will Call it the W.A. Latham HLC ghost printed W version. should be worth about $300+ normally but I will take offers of no less than $5000+ I mean it is a POP 1 and there are no others or corrected types.

Crazy there are 4 new variations in an few months

[Matt]

Originally Posted by Pup6913

I am a little pissed as now I have to explain to my wife I need another card for the set and that now it is going to be another over priced inflated card.

At least you and Matt E and honest that your opposition to this being called a variation is biased because it means you have to chase another cards for your sets

anyone know the pop report forthe Cycle Mathewson???

Am I going to have to kill someone for the card(if its high enough grade I may think about it)

Or is it like anyother cycle and just waiting to be sold?

What do you think the premiums are going to be?

I may pay a bit more but not 2-10x's like some seller think cycles are worth

[Matt E.]

My friend Matt W.

There is no possible way you know my motives or how many, if any, sit right here beside me on my desk. Pup runs with his own pack.

I bet it was you who called SGC leading the charge on this one. Right?

Either way you got a nice hit from Ebay if I remember correctly.

[Matt]

Originally Posted by Matt E.

I bet it was you who called SGC leading the charge on this one. Right?

Not I; as I said - if it was up to me, it should be labeled "Mathewson 37-1" just as Wilhelm is labeled "Wilhelm suffered"

[Tcards-Please]

Andrew,

I'm not sure what PSA's is, but SGC's pop report shows 11 total.
(2) - 20
(2) - 30
(3) - 40
(2) - 50
(2) - 60

I don't know how many of those 11 were sent to PSA for crossover, but I know that mine was crossed over from PSA.

r/
Frank