|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
But the biggest reason for keeping a print copy going is readers and users need to have something tangible if they are not buying an item on line.
Having said that; thanks to the abomination that was the early years of this decades when it came to new products being released (i.e. 90+ baseball products in 2004 before hitting team issues; etc.) caused the overload of pages. I do agree with Bob that print is so 2000's but I personally, and I suspect most of the readers of this board, prefer to have something tangible to look up items with. And the other; unspoken reason for keeping a print publication going is that having such a deadline always keeps on on their toes for new items. Out of sight, out of mind and especially so if such a book like the SC was only on line. I may write more later, but with my experience I'd hate to see such a book fall by the wayside. Rich |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2010 Standard Catalog Thankyou Bob And Don | batsballsbases | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-04-2009 06:22 PM |
| Looking for help for 2010 Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-08-2009 07:56 PM |
| Using the 2007 Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-17-2007 04:58 PM |
| Experts sought for 2008 SCD Standard Catalog Team/Let the flames begin! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 10-11-2006 09:31 PM |
| Problems with Standard Catalog Old Judge section | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-01-2002 07:03 AM |