![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm collecting 52 topps in PSA 7+ and personally it's because 6s usually looks like crap to me. Sometimes there are nice looking psa 6 cards, but they're usually further off-center than I like. Also, if I decide to sell them there is room for profit or to at least get my money back. Too much goes to fees on a $20 card.
Also, I feel it would be too easy to get the set in PSA 6. PSA 7, or better baby! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At arms length a 7 will look just like a 9, but will cost over 75% less.
What would the smart collector collect?? ![]() IMO collectors who ONLY want 8 and above are in it for the status of having the best card/set, etc. There are many a 7 that look just as good as any 8 or 9 for a fraction of the cost. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also think there needs to be talks about investment or collectible.
I also like to purchase 7's, as I find them more affordable and nicer (there are some ugly 7's though). I try to use this as a gauge: 1950's - 7's 1960's - 8's 1970's current 9's That is what I see as "best buys" for the money... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
mine targets are one grade below yours
For my budget, I target: 1950s = PSA 6 1960s = PSA 7 1970s = PSA 8 1980s+ - PSA 9
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For centering I have noticed many 5's are much nicer than a 6 or 7 with only flaw soft corners. Or a nrmt perfect card that is a 5 because of a small corner ding. My only advice is don't get so caught up in the grade you pass up a nice 5 or 6 for way less than a 7 or 8 when they really have no difference.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a 1955 Killebrew RC PSA5 that (to me) looks like a 7+
Now, there is a centering issue, which I acknowledge, but I don't consider it severe-in part because the 1955 card design doesn't call attention to it like a 1961 or 1967 would, but other than that...can't find anything wrong with the card...love it.
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
this one is terribly relevant...
I hit the BIN last weekend on a 5-card lot of PSA 7 Ernie Banks cards (1967 through 1971) for $150...I can be happy with $30 each and knocking off a chunk at one time. Now if I can find someone who will do the same thing for me on Eddie Mathews, we will be all set!!!
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
there are plenty of affordable 6's that looks just as good and you can find 5's that look stunning sometimes.
i much prefer raw cards, but i love finding a stunner in a low grade slab on the cheap |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I recently picked up a couple of 1960s star cards in PSA 5 holders that to me could pass for 7s,...definitely goes both ways, and different aspects appeal to different folks...gotta focus on the card and not the flip.
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This came in the mail today, leaving me two cards short of his Topps Run ('57 and '52)
![]()
__________________
Currently Working On: PSA Graded Post-War HOF Rookie Card Collection - 100%! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How would you handle slab condition issues? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 04-28-2009 06:37 AM |
Solution to Slab Cracking Issues (With a Side Benefit) for SGC/PSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-29-2008 06:57 PM |
PSA - Why not slab miscut cards?!? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-10-2008 12:14 PM |
To slab or not to slab? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-18-2006 12:36 PM |
Toughest Slab to Crack | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-30-2003 07:11 AM |