 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
11-26-2009, 11:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
IMO when you get to a place where you are willing to spend thousands and tens of thousands of dollars for differences in a card that it takes a neutron microscope to detect, then it has become about more than the card. Personally I don't have the resources or the stomach for that but that is what the top end of the hobby has become and I mean top-end from a grading perspective. There is nothing right or wrong about it but in turn it is wholly dependent at that point on the TPG companies and their ability to do a good, consistent and un-biased job.
BTW, to my thinking it is a matter of time probably bf the Cobb in question is back in a numbered holder. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is there a way to take the subjective out of grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-03-2008 06:10 PM |
| Grading Device for accurate Centering | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-25-2007 01:42 PM |
| GAI vs SGC Market Value | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 10-07-2007 09:05 AM |
| A lesson in perceived market value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-16-2006 08:33 AM |
| Grading card company rules............ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-19-2004 12:33 PM |
Threaded Mode