|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hilariously ironic that Pete Calderon was the one who had to answer to the legalized shilling question. Pete has some resume in this business.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Now it all makes sense why that green tinted Harrington's Earl Smith card had a few bids on it at above the $10,000 minimum.
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't even think that Harrington sold. I heard the consignor got it back.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Barry, that is what I was getting at. It had several bids on it and didn't even sell for the super inflated price--how odd!
Why would somebody [not trying to falsely inflate the price of a $100-200 oddity] not take a bid of $13,000 or something for the card? Answer: None of the bids were legit!
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 Last edited by rhettyeakley; 01-30-2010 at 04:35 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rhett- what I heard, and this baffles me, is that mid-auction the consignor decided he no longer wanted to sell it, asked for it back, and the house capitulated. I can't of course confirm that.
When I ran auctions if a consignor had asked for his material back while my auction was in progress I would have told him tough noogies (did I spell "noogies" correctly?). |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've seen it spelled "nougies," but I'm no expert.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree completely with Jim VB. With the so-called Heritage Rule 21 in play, it ceases to be an auction and becomes something else entirely. I'm not sure what, but as Elaine Benes once said, "Do I smell something? What am I, hard of smelling? Of *course* I smell something."
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I actually asked this question on another board, but got no responses, so maybe I put it in the wrong board. After reading this thread, maybe I can ask this here:
The latest Legacy Rarities auction. I was the high bidder on the 1955 Bowman Football set at $1,150. I was bid #11. I was outbid with bid #12, but the bid is now $1,950. Why would the next bidder jump the bid in an $800 increment? Wouldn't he want to win the item as cheaply as possible?? I was just curious as to everyones' thoughts on this...... |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| a few board updates | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 09-07-2007 03:08 PM |
| Board Policy -- Deleting off-topic posts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-28-2007 05:11 PM |
| this thread is quite sad......... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 05-05-2007 01:43 PM |
| Biggest page view day ever on the board | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-19-2005 09:43 PM |
| New (old) Board Direction- IMPORTANT | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 70 | 03-22-2005 09:34 AM |