 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-10-2010, 03:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
A+ to legendary for being upfront with full disclosure of all the restorations dating back to the 80's...even tho doug wasn't sure of the card's would be grade a month ago.
where can i read the description in case it made into a 1 holder? 
|
|
#2
02-10-2010, 03:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
T206 wagner
Jeff,
I was going to say the same thing! Why would you do that to one of the grails of the hobby. I believe the card would have done much better without all that work. But I guess the same question could be asked about the Plank! But I guess we can save that story for another day! 
|
|
#3
02-10-2010, 04:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think it's in the same chapter about me protecting banner advertisers  .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#4
02-10-2010, 04:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
T206 Wagner
Leon,
I read that book also! I believe the next line was "Do on to others but never let it be done to me" A quote from the mastro handbook
|
|
#5
02-10-2010, 04:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If the card came back graded a 2, would we have been given the same details about its past?
|
|
#6
02-10-2010, 04:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
02-10-2010, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm just naturally skeptical.
|
|
#8
02-10-2010, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Al- hopefully you're correct. I agree they probably would have, but this is a funny hobby. Anything goes.
|
|
#9
02-10-2010, 05:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not...
|
|
#10
02-10-2010, 06:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry Blair, but I doubt that Legendary doesn't have (or believe they have) the in house expertise to tell if it was a fake or not. If they thought there was a chance it was a fake they wouldn't have put it in their press release.
If it came back in a 2 holder they might very well have disclosed the history of the card. However what is the point of doing the work to get it in a 2 holder if you intend to disclose that it is an AUT?
|
|
#11
02-10-2010, 04:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
t206 wagner
Barry,
I would have to say yes and the only reason I would say this is because I believe so many people knew about this card that if they tried to pass it off as anything but they would have lost every bit of respectability they have been trying to rebuild.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wondering about duplicate Honus Wagner Tobacco Card Value | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-03-2019 06:11 AM |
| Recent passing of a relative of Honus Wagner! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-14-2011 11:43 PM |
| SOLD - 1906 Fan Craze NL - Honus Wagner HOF (PSA 7) | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 08-31-2007 02:17 PM |
| You are 3 Degrees from Honus Wagner ! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-17-2007 08:20 PM |
| Unanswered questions concerning the proper dating of the T206 Honus Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-20-2003 07:09 AM |
Hybrid Mode
