Has Anyone Seen This Ruth-Gehrig autograph Topps card?

[PhilNap]

Here are larger images. We still happy with the Gehrig? The paper and the ink look awfully similar as well.

[prewarsports]

Does not look like the same one as in the first photo.

[HRBAKER]

That doesn't look like the same card to me. In the first one shown by Richard the Gehrig looks much lighter and the top of the "L" is much closer to the frame than on the second example.

[PhilNap]

You guys are right. How many of these did they make?

[PhilNap]

The image I posted matches the image on Topps' promotional sheet for the set.

See here (page 5): http://www.topps.com/productsellshee...all1349746.pdf

Apparently that was a prototype and not the actual card that ended up in a pack.

[perezfan]

Good thing it's a prototype, as that Gehrig is not authentic.

[bobbvc]

Almost said it earlier, but didn't want to presume. It looks to me like both autos were done by the same person in one sitting...

[RichardSimon]

I had seen that also. No question it is different than the one I posted. I was not sure what it was though, whether a card or something else, so I did not post it.
And the Gehrig is awful on it,,looks like it could be something that came from the Roaches, geez Topps, bad enough you mess with Andrew Jackson's signature but you make a mess of Ruth and Gehrig also.
(Jackson never signed on two lines. Topps cut this signature from a document or letter and then cut the signature in half to fit it on this moronic card). They also mutilated the "n" in Jackson,,, nice work Topps.
--