 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31
03-04-2010, 09:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I think Jim's right. There are hundreds of different nuanced variations. I think for most folks whether the card has some punch (in terms of unusualness and visual impact) is what affects monetary value. Leon's card clearly has that. For some people, part of a missing E does. For others it doesn't. Here are two of my favorites (not appearing anytime soon on BST). I think they have some punch. Others may disagree. It's no big deal; I collect what I like.
One of the consequences of the way most T206s were printed (vertical columns of the same card) is that there are lots of the "same" variation out there. By lots I mean a handful, at least. It's amazing how many cards seem like they could be one-offs, and several more are lurking out there somewhere.  
Last edited by jimonym; 03-04-2010 at 09:09 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T3's, T205 & T206 Printing Errors, T207's, T212's, T222 | Brailey | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 01-14-2010 01:39 AM |
| Looking for double names, miscuts, printing errors, proofs, ghost, errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 08-19-2008 04:03 PM |
| Wanted: T206 miscuts & printing errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 8 | 04-08-2007 08:12 PM |
| Show Us Your E Printing Mistakes, Errors, and Oddballs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-16-2006 05:13 PM |
| Printing Errors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-28-2003 01:43 PM |
Threaded Mode