 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-24-2010, 06:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Hi JimB,
I agree with JimR that Cobb/Cobb gets left off of most lists due to the cost associated with acquiring one.... While I do believe that it was distributed differently than the rest of the "T206 set", it was produced by the same company and does belong on the list.... Hi Jim, Ted, Scott, Barry, etc.... I think we will continue to tweak this list as we plow forward toward the "Superset".... Be well Brian PS Can we go back 6-7 years when no one cared about the backs.....? 
|
|
#2
03-24-2010, 09:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ty Cobb Ty Cobb
I can go either way on the Ty Cobb - Cobb back card. Not sure if it was mentioned in this thread but I thought for some time it was thought to maybe have come in the tins? Was that thought completely dispelled?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#3
03-24-2010, 11:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
JimB&cobb/cobb
I must say that when JimB puts on his professor hat and argues with
philosophical and logical acumen, it is most refreshing and convincing. The arguments regarding Burdick's classification system coupled with Ted's corroborative newspaper articles and the illustrative analogy regarding the lone woman on the major league team coalesce so cogently that i must add my vote to place Cobb/Cobb on the list at #3. If the blank backs would disappear, i could get some peaceful rest now. great work T206 scholars. Hi Brian, how's the ole tarhill buddy? best, barry Last edited by ethicsprof; 03-24-2010 at 11:28 PM. Reason: had to say hi to BrianW!!!
|
|
#4
03-25-2010, 12:15 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
with only 15 known copies, does it really matter what you call it??
If you have one, do you really care? Just do your dance of joy and wave it around and leave it at that!
__________________
"There is no such thing as over educated! It is better to be quiet and thought of as a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt!!
|
|
#5
03-25-2010, 12:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I came across some data I compiled for a couple of years of the backs I use to own. Obviously this was before my quest for the Cycle 460s. I compiled this over about a 2 year period, I probably stopped around 2007.
AB 350 No Frame-4 AB 350 Frame-6 AB 460 - 5 Broadleaf 350 - 2 Carolina Brights-2 Cycle 350-10 Cycle 460-8 EPDG-3 Hindu-6 Hindu (SL)-1 Red Hindu-1 OM-11 OM (SL)-13 Pied 150 25-85 Pied 350 25-225 Pied 460 25-30 Pied 460 42-2 Pied 350 (SL)-14 Polar Bear-24 Tolstoi-11 Sov 150-2 Sov 350-7 Sov 460-13 SC 150 25-13 SC 150 30-30 SC 150 649-6 SC 350 25-11 SC 350 30-69 SC 460 25-4 SC 460 30-6 SC 460 42 PO-6 SC 460 42-5 Uzit-1 Lee Last edited by Sterling Sports Auctions; 03-25-2010 at 12:31 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Backs set | cfc1909 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 12-08-2015 07:24 PM |
| The T206 350-Only Series - Some Observations on Available Backs | jimonym | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-07-2009 09:23 PM |
| T206 Backs, top 10 rarest | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-04-2008 10:50 PM |
| Clear your walls, the T206 Backs Framed Display Pieces are Here! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 12-27-2006 05:59 PM |
| t206 backs, mainly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-03-2005 06:55 AM |
Hybrid Mode
