 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
03-30-2010, 12:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Would it offend all notions of card collecting if a grading company put an invisible stamp (one that could only be seen under flourscent light) on the back of the card with an identification number? The card would then go into the registry and therefore when we look at the POP reports, everyone knows that card no. 0000001 of T206 Cobb has been graded by SGC a 6, etc. and that it hasn't been cracked and re-slabbed as a PSA 8. Or does placing any type of ink on the back of the card simply too much to expect a collector to be okay with?
Thoughts are appreciated.[/QUOTE] stop it your killing me! 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Consistent grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-25-2008 05:09 PM |
| Grading Compnay Questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-11-2008 03:51 PM |
| One of the things that's wrong with the current grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-28-2007 08:04 AM |
| What is it, exactly, about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-27-2006 08:42 AM |
| Starting a Grading Company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-22-2004 10:57 AM |
Threaded Mode