A discussion on the term "rare".

Matt · #1 04-02-2010, 10:31 AM

And just to add - everyone views rarity in terms of their own collecting approach - e.g. as a type collector, Leon mentioned 50 cards showing up and some might no longer consider that issue rare, though, maybe only 1 of each player showed up and so another collector would view each player's card as rare.

A perfect example of this is the E101 and E102 issues. The E101 set has twice as many cards as the E102 set. E102s were often considered to be a tougher type card then E101 (though current populations show far fewer total E101s then E102s), but because the E101 set has so many more subjects, FAR fewer cards of each E101 subject exist then E102. The market is slowly catching up with that.

Frank A · #2 04-02-2010, 11:00 AM

Rare is a term used to get the most money you can out of an item. If you look on ebay every day there are so many rare items every day that it is unbelieveable. Rare should only be given to those items that are truly low in production numbers. An original painting, some early test coinage, etc. I feel that if there is fifty of something it is not rare. Scarce perhaps, but not rare. Ebay has taken the rarity out of many items that were thought to be rare. Just an opnion. Frank

teetwoohsix · #3 04-02-2010, 11:02 AM

In the T206 realm,I think with the explosion of interest in rare backs,and rare front/back combo's,there will probably be a "re-birth" on what is considered a "rarity".

For instance,there are many Red Cobb's out there,but TedZ pointed out that there are (I hope I'm getting this right,and apologize if I'm not) something like only 4 known examples of the Red Cobb with the Sov.460 back.That would make that front/back combo extremely more rare than the Wagner,Plank,and the Magie error.But I guess it hasn't garnered that status because there are many more Red Cobb T206's out there in population without regard to "backs".

I love the fact that people are really starting to recognize the front/back combo's more and more,because I think it is creating sort of a "new standard" of rarity within the T206 set,and a new respect for the difficulty of certain cards/combo's........

Sincerely,Clayton

ethicsprof · #4 04-02-2010, 11:35 AM

'At least a rarity scale quantifies a subjective term.'
I agree wholeheartedly.
best,
barry

Potomac Yank · #5 04-02-2010, 12:09 PM

The four letter word "rare," has totally lost it's meaning.

Whenever I see it, I instantly equate it to the four letter word "HYPE."

You can have all the surveys you want, they're just a drop in the bucket of the unknown raw cards out there. ... but they are fun to read.

Matt · #6 04-02-2010, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Potomac Yank

You can have all the surveys you want, they're just a drop in the bucket of the unknown raw cards out there.

Joe - I'm sure that's true, but it stands to reason that they are representative of the greater distribution, just like a poll represents the full population. If SGC has only graded 100 cards of a particular issue and 5000 cards of another, we can safely assume the ungraded cards also exist in correlating ratios.

Potomac Yank · #7 04-02-2010, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt

Joe - I'm sure that's true, but it stands to reason that they are representative of the greater distribution, just like a poll represents the full population. If SGC has only graded 100 cards of a particular issue and 5000 cards of another, we can safely assume the ungraded cards also exist in correlating ratios.

*

I beg to differ ... a poll does not represent the full population ... It only represents the ones that took the poll.
How often have you looked at a poll, and passed by it?

An example, this forum is active in many ways, to those in it, it almost appears like the whole Cardoholic world is here.
Nothing could be further from the truth.

We're just a dot in Cardoholic Collector/Investor Portfolio World.

Stay well,
Joe

cbcbcb · #8 04-02-2010, 03:23 PM

I think rare is much better used with memorabilia than cards.

Matt · #9 04-02-2010, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Potomac Yank

*

I beg to differ ... a poll does not represent the full population ... It only represents the ones that took the poll.

It only counts the ones who took the poll; however, the concept of a poll is an attempt to statistically represent the entire population, through sampling a small segment. Maybe you don't agree with the concept of a poll, which is your right. When done properly, with a truly random sample, there is statistical validity to the results, within the given margin of error.

Frank A · #10 04-02-2010, 03:26 PM

I really believe that it's time to list the cigarette makers of tobacco cards seperate. I know I will hear a lot of cons about it, but each brand should be on its own. Bulking these all together in a price guide is not how it should be. There is enough info out there now to have a good idea of what backs go with what players of each cigarette company.

oldjudge · #11 04-02-2010, 04:16 PM

Interesting question! The dictionary defines "rare" as not widely known or found, valued for its uncommonness. However, I think when most of us think of rare we think of a much more restrictive definition such that a rare card is one that a collector will only have an opportunity to acquire, cost aside, at a few points in their life. By the dictionary definition the T206 Wagner is indeed rare; it is not widely found. I haven't found any recently. However, by the way I think most of us in the hobby think of rare, the Wagner is not rare; if you had the money you would have the opportunity to bid for one several times a year. I think the rarity scale that Barry mentioned is the best way of handling rarity.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Long Term Effects of Economic Slowdown	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	9	01-06-2009 12:40 PM
Jewish baseball history discussion	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	3	05-24-2008 04:57 PM
MastroNet Lot Misrepresentation � Results of a Discussion with Doug Allen	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	31	02-07-2007 12:21 AM
For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	3	06-02-2006 10:57 AM
The Term Pre War Card	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	2	04-22-2006 11:50 PM