![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not my area of knowledge, but that is awesome. Those guys look like a bunch of straight players! Very vivid.
Nice stuff, Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could it be a team with Fleet and Welday Walker? Fleet was a catcher, and Welday played with him very briefly for Toledo in 1884. The players may fit, but the "R" on the uniform doesn't.
Steve B |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am not an expert on Fleet, and I don't mean this in any kind of bigoted way, but from what I think I have seen, Fleet didn't have that kind of "afro" hair style? And of course he could have changed it but still it seems there won't be a consensus, from the board, on who the team/players is/are, or what the event is? Thanks to all who chimed in. More thoughts are welcomed. (For the record the owner is keeping it for now, according to the email I received). thanks again.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I strongly suspect this is an amateur team.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, one of the players is obviously Joe DiMaggio . . .
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm hardly an expert either. I happened to read a little about them last night so they were fresh in my mind when I saw the pic. Amateur team makes sense, especially with the mix of uniforms
steve B |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not even CLOSE to being an expert but from the looks of these guys, could it be a college or fraternity team of some sort? Maybe an amateur team from an upper class area of the country?
Why I say this is because, from most of the tin types of groups of ball players I have seen from back then, most of the guys are rough and scruffy. But these guys look well coifed and clothed. For the most part, their hair is neat and styled, a few are wearing neckerchiefs and their boots look like riding boots and not just work boots. Of course, I might be totally wrong (definitely NOT the first that has happened). David Oops, upon closer inspection, it looks like they are NOT wearing boots but nice dress shoes from that time period. Last edited by ctownboy; 04-03-2010 at 01:21 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm wondering if these guys are even really baseball players. It looks like the picture was taken in a studio and since all the uniforms are different, or at least most of them, and that the equipment looks fairly pristine from what you can see, it's possible that this is just a group of guys who put on all the baseball gear the photographer had. None of their uniforms, which are white, are even slightly dirty.
Just my opinion. If Einstein can't figure it out what hope do I have. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Sale: Late 1860's to early 1870's 2 Player Tintype w/Gorgeous Image $450 | packs | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 06-01-2009 08:28 PM |
Late 1860s to Early 1870s Tintype For Sale | packs | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-06-2009 11:57 AM |
what do you guys think about this tintype? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-27-2009 01:11 PM |
Recent Pickup - Baseball team tintype | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 06-01-2007 07:06 PM |
Baseball Tintype | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 3 | 07-11-2006 02:04 PM |