|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the forum, we generally use rare to describe the # that exist and scarce to describe the # that make it to market.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is the way I think of it too!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
VS the scarcity mindset. Guess which one overwhelms this forum?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
This means that something can be considered scarce once demand exceeds supply. Nothing can be rare based solely on demand.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Think about a Ten Million Obak. It seems like a scarce card, not a rare one. (And I might be showing my ignorance of Obaks with this example.) There's always a ready market for one when it does appear, and you might have to wait a while for that to happen. Bill |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
correct.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rare to me is 25-50 examples
Ultra Rare to me is 2-25 examples. While I am at it, I would say Scarce to me is 50-100 examples of any one card. So I would say the T206 Honus Wagner for example is scarce or very scarce. (Meaning 50-75 examples would be very scarce and 76-100 examples would be scarce) Just some quick thoughts on how I value the word Rare and Scarce. Of course I would plug in Ultra Rare and Ultra Scarce to meet these 2 in the middle. 2 cents...
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia Last edited by DixieBaseball; 04-04-2010 at 10:02 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think of rare in terms of supply and demand (and I agree the term scarce is a better word, but I believe this is just semantics since most people think rare = scarce even though they're not exactly the same). Therefore, if say there are 50K active baseball collectors in the world, if there are 25K copies of a card, I would consider that abundant. If there are only 100 copies of that card, I would consider that rare. However, I would also put that in terms of cards that these collectors WANT to collect. For example, anyone would want to collect the T206 Honus Wagner just like everyone wants to collect the 86 Jordan RC. However, there are some sets, like Game Owned sets or regional sets, that not everyone wants to collect. The people who want to collect those issues can be fanatics, but the normal collector would probably pass on those sets. So even if there are only 500 cards of those available for that kind of set, since there aren't that many people who want to collect them, they wouldn't really be considered rare, IMHO.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Long Term Effects of Economic Slowdown | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-06-2009 12:40 PM |
| Jewish baseball history discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-24-2008 04:57 PM |
| MastroNet Lot Misrepresentation – Results of a Discussion with Doug Allen | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 02-07-2007 12:21 AM |
| For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-02-2006 10:57 AM |
| The Term Pre War Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-22-2006 11:50 PM |