T-206 Master List vs. Inaccurate PSA Master Set

JP · #1 04-05-2010, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrysloate

That's a fair point...if JP just listed the BL460's we would have saved a lot of grief. The question wasn't sarcastic, people on this board checklist every T206 back and there was the potential for a new addition. So I agree JP should have just answered the question.

Barry, information was being held hostage until I disclosed which BL460s I owned...even though it wasn't relevant to MY thread. I'm under no obligation to share what I own or what I have owned. I'm aware of the Ted Z checklist of BL460s and none of mine were unknowns.

barrysloate · #2 04-05-2010, 04:12 PM

JP- you have the right to keep your collection private. But if that is your wish, it's wrong to come onto a thread with the juicy detail that you know about three BL460, something this board would love to have details of, and then say it's private. If I were you I wouldn't have even brought it up.

barrysloate · #3 04-05-2010, 04:14 PM

Leon- that was my implied point. If JP claims to know of three rare cards, but won't disclose them, the board of course won't believe him. I didn't either. But now he says he wants to keep it private, and my response was he never should have brought it up (and there was the slight possibility he was being truthful, and I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt).

Abravefan11 · #4 04-05-2010, 04:22 PM

Jim - I wasn't talking about you in regards to this thread.

There is a lot wrong with both sides here.

I agree if you're going to post a question regarding a hobby problem you should care enough to want to do something about it as several people (including me) suggested. When people do respond with ideas calling them "worthless" is not the way to win favor.

I think debate is the pathway to knowledge, but in many cases these threads are reduced to playground name calling and that doesn't accomplish anything.

Jim VB · #5 04-05-2010, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abravefan11

Jim - I wasn't talking about you in regards to this thread.

Thanks Tim!

barrysloate · #6 04-05-2010, 04:35 PM

Ruining humanity since 1955...now that's funny.

That's what this board needs more of.

tedzan · #7 04-05-2010, 05:36 PM

Once again, someone (you in this case) steps in here and criticizes me without being aware of the entire story.
I have had past misunderstandings with this guy "JP". At first I was very generous with him by sharing my T206
expertise. After a while he became a nuisance with recurring PM's. Even, after I stopped replying to them. He
started again today with his PM's, so I blocked them.

Do you understand now, Dan ?

What bothers me in this instance is that he (and sometimes others) view the Graded Company's data and they
think that this is "the real world" of BB card collecting.
And, this is so far removed from the truth. I think that you can agree with that statement ?

Regards,

TED Z

Abravefan11 · #8 04-05-2010, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedzan

What bothers me in this instance is that he (and sometimes others) view the Graded Company's data and they think that this is "the real world" of BB card collecting.

Ted, Regardless is your past history with JP his initial post said nothing about TPGed cards being "the real world."

He simply asked why when it was common knowledge to many on this board through your and Scot Reader's work that their registry could be so far from something accurate.

Then in your first post you added "So, try to get your facts straight before you post."

How is that not combative?

And if there was a history and you feel the need to igonore his PM's than why not his threads as well?

slidekellyslide · #9 04-05-2010, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedzan

Once again, someone (you in this case) steps in here and criticizes me without being aware of the entire story.
I have had past misunderstandings with this guy "JP". At first I was very generous with him by sharing my T206
expertise. After a while he became a nuisance with recurring PM's. Even, after I stopped replying to them. He
started again today with his PM's, so I blocked them.

Do you understand now, Dan ?

What bothers me in this instance is that he (and sometimes others) view the Graded Company's data and they
think that this is "the real world" of BB card collecting.
And, this is so far removed from the truth. I think that you can agree with that statement ?

Regards,

TED Z

Ted, you misunderstood JP's original post and attacked him for something he wasn't even arguing. It should have been clear to you on a second read of the post. I have no idea what goes on in PM's on this site (contrary to the warped views of a few paranoid individuals). So if you have problems with JP I'd suggest putting him in your ignore list. I'd be happy to let you know how to do that if you don't already know.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
1971 PSA HOF, 68-79 PSA and some raw	Zact	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	4	09-05-2009 07:59 AM
Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH	Archive	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	04-12-2009 11:05 AM
T201 MIDGRADE SET SGC PSA GRADED NOW SOLD	Archive	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	2	02-09-2008 11:16 AM
PSA GRADED 1,2, & 3's 60 T206's NEW SALE PRICES	Archive	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	1	09-27-2006 05:16 PM
PSA Graded T-206's for Sale	Archive	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	4	09-21-2006 10:19 PM