T-206 Master List vs. Inaccurate PSA Master Set

Abravefan11 · #1 04-05-2010, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrysloate

So I agree JP should have just answered the question.

The simple solution doesn't always make it the right solution.

I agree that if JP just posted the 3 BL460's that would have been the end of it. But was his past or present card holdings relevant to the discussion?

I know why Jim R (Hey Jim

) wanted the information, but in withholding his response to JP's initial post until he got it may not have been the way to go about getting it either.

Many collectors don't like to discuss their collections publicly. Or if they do, only the parts they wish to discuss.

tedzan · #2 04-05-2010, 04:41 PM

In your Post # 47 you stated.......
" Your inquiry as to how many t-206s I have was immediately following your statement that you own thousands.
I know exactly why you asked that question, and so do you. "

OK, so now you can read our minds....and, you know exactly why I asked that question ? You amaze me, but you
are not as intuitive as you think you are.

You are totally off-base in attempting to read my mind. I was interested in having a reasonable discussion with you
on the topic you initiated here...."T206 master set".

As, this topic has always intrigued me. But, you blew it with your apparent paranoia to anything asked of you. Fur-
thermore, you twist the discussion around and become combative.

This is not the way conversations are conducted on in this forum.

TED Z

slidekellyslide · #3 04-05-2010, 04:49 PM

Ted, you attacked JP in your very first reply in this thread. It was pretty clear to me that JP was referencing the PSA registry and not non-graded collectors. I understand that many of you guys are upset at JP for certain things that irritate you, but you don't need to bring them to every post he makes. If someone irritates you that much you need to start using the ignore button if you can't help but reply negatively to everything posted.

cfc1909 · #4 04-05-2010, 05:07 PM

I wanted to know what 3 BL 460s because that would have mattered in my response.
I do not attack anyone-I stay away from the negative threads.
I share my information and my collection and would have had a great answer and it would have been a great thread.

I am close to not posting anymore. I like hanging out here and sharing my information but this is getting to be a bit much.

I would not have asked about the 3 BLs if they were not mentioned-and it matters so I can answer accurately.

maybe I could have asked better but I have a pretty good rep for being easy.

slidekellyslide · #5 04-05-2010, 05:14 PM

I wasn't referencing you at all Jim. I saw your reply to JP in the BL460 thread and it seemed reasonable to me.

Leon · #6 04-05-2010, 05:22 PM

Jim- My response above was aimed a little bit in your direction, not solely, but a little bit. It just seems like every single thing that JP says he gets attacked on, and that isn't right. I went to the other thread and do see you were really just asking to see if he owned BL460's that were confirmed or not. My apologies to you. As for everyone else.....lets try to be civil and friendly. thanks....

JP · #7 04-05-2010, 05:27 PM

How three known BL460s from years ago has any relevance to the Cy Young I asked about is beyond me. I should've just said "I've never owned a BL460 with a clean back." As I told Leon, I knew it was a mistake as soon as I submitted it.

There was no reason to hold valuable information hostage until I answered a question that I wanted to keep private. None of them are for sale or are in any registries, unless they were graded VERY recently, so I'm not sure what parallel you could draw from those to the Young. Can you please explain it to me?

EDIT: and remember too, Jim, that I did directly offer to you discuss which I owned and when, via email, but for some reason you decided to ignore that offer and make a stink on the board about it.

wonkaticket · #8 04-05-2010, 05:33 PM

Well I certainly didn�t attack him, I read his post the same way Ed did above. Even when I suggested perhaps he should contact PSA with his thoughts I was told my input was a �worthless suggestion�.

Then he proceeded to talk to me in ALL CAPS like I'm an 8yr old kid..asking me if GET IT NOW?

I have no idea of why he would be so sensitive don�t really care either. My only connection to JP is I�ve been high bidder on his Plank card in REA that Rob Lifson gave him such a sweet deal to list etc. How do I know this card is his he told the board, which for a guy who likes to keep his collection private he seems to share a lot of info?

JP · #9 04-05-2010, 05:42 PM

Sorry, John. Reacted out of frustation, because like Ted before you, you made reference to raw card collections out there, which had nothing to do with what my thread was about. I'm obviously am on the defensive because I'm constantly under attack, but I apologize for taking it out on you.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
1971 PSA HOF, 68-79 PSA and some raw	Zact	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	4	09-05-2009 07:59 AM
Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH	Archive	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	04-12-2009 11:05 AM
T201 MIDGRADE SET SGC PSA GRADED NOW SOLD	Archive	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	2	02-09-2008 11:16 AM
PSA GRADED 1,2, & 3's 60 T206's NEW SALE PRICES	Archive	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	1	09-27-2006 05:16 PM
PSA Graded T-206's for Sale	Archive	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	4	09-21-2006 10:19 PM