 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
04-22-2010, 08:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
It was really the size argument that got me thinking about it and also in the context of a Cobb/Cobb. I realize it is a T206 but it just seems like it has some points against it. Was really just throwing it out there to see what reaction would come of it.
I think the T206-1, -2 nomenclature going forward is viable and really a great way to update the ACC without wrecking it. Last edited by toppcat; 04-22-2010 at 08:48 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New theory why American Beauty cards are narrower than other T206's | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 04-05-2010 09:16 PM |
| T206 American Beauty contest....can you confirm these ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 06-23-2009 04:26 PM |
| PSA 5 American Beauty & Cycle T206s Sold. | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-30-2008 09:26 PM |
| T206 American Beauty's and Cycle's | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-20-2006 01:59 PM |
| T206 Cycle's and American Beauty's For Sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 02-12-2006 08:41 AM |
Threaded Mode