|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just remembered where I got the scan of the Doolan - 2008 REA. Here's the link: http://www.robertedwardauctions.com/.../2008/441.html
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Craig W
I would assume that the Pirate 96-card set that sold a few years ago included a Cobb. It sounds like a complete set. Since this Pirate issue is identical to the T215-1 issue; therefore, the Cobb should be the Bat off Shoulder version. TED Z |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was a near set...and did NOT include a Cobb.
http://www.legendaryauctions.com/Lot...px?lotid=75301 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
are ther any other sets that have a 97 card checklist?
__________________
T206Resource.com |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting thought Jim.
97 is a prime number (can't be divided by anything and still get a whole number). So, (unless cards were printed one at a time, which is quite unlikely) if the cards were printed on sheets, a sheet would have to have all the same front; OR there would have to be double prints; OR there would have to be some non-baseball fronts on the baseball sheets.
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com Last edited by White Borders; 05-05-2010 at 09:32 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is the reason for thinking there is a Cobb with a Pirate back based on the crossing of the Type 1's ? Just wondering,because if that were the case, what about :
1.) Crandall,New York Nat'l -Type 1,but no Pirate 2.)Ball,Cleveland -Type 1,but no Pirate 3.)Conroy,Washington -Type 1,but no Pirate 4.)Hartsel,Toledo - Type 1,but no Pirate 5.)Latham, N.Y. Nat'l -Type 1,but no Pirate Anyhow, there are more-just using these as an example.And there seem to be more Pirate backed cards that don't have a Type 1 example,than the other way around. So,is the theory that there is a Cobb with a Pirate back somewhere out there because there is a Cobb Type 1 ? Sincerely,Clayton |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Bill |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, there are 96 different subjects....and, one variation....Bobby Byrne (St. Louis) and 2nd card of Byrne
identifying him with Pittsburg (traded August 1909). In my opinion....the change in teams for Byrne narrows down this set to a 1910 issue ? If it was a 1912 issue, as catalogued, there would not have been any reason to issue two cards of Byrne. Your thoughts, gentleman ? ? TED Z |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| COBB CARDS WANTED | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 61 | 04-30-2009 12:44 PM |
| Atlanta Card Show: Cobb Civic Center, This Weekend | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-16-2008 02:00 PM |
| T206 Rare Cards , Ty Cobbs , DRUM, UZIT ,T215 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 10 | 05-16-2007 08:45 PM |
| Paying up for any PC 800's or rare Cobb & Wagner cards. | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 12-24-2006 01:27 PM |
| Cobb, Johnson and other Texas Tommy cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-23-2006 03:28 PM |