How to get ripped off by SCP Auctions & Sotheby's

[Wesley]

Originally Posted by Archive

Posted By: peter chao

Jason,

None that I know of, maybe if you check with the local chamber of commerce.

A friendly bump to see if we can get an update.

Peter C.

It's about time Leon reinstates Peter Chao's posting privileges.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Wesley

It's about time Leon reinstates Peter Chao's posting privileges.

registered the first day of the new board.......I have the email to prove it


1. Net54Baseball.com Username... Calvindog
2. First & Last name... Peter Chao
3. Daytime ph# (might be called for verification)... 212-xxx-xxxx

[cfc1909]

this thread will go way higher than #211 now

that was funny

[Rich Klein]

To this board

I actually miss him

Rich

[sports-rings]

Perhaps this is off topic but maybe it's not.

In the current Leland's auction (you can see the items online as the catalogs have not all been delivered yet) there were three fake rings.

I would like your opinions on this matter.

I am a championship ring collector and have accumulated a large database of rings. This database is a valuable tool in helping to determine if a ring is legit. It's amazing how many fake rings there are out there and now there is a disturbing trend where fake rings have bogus markings inside of the rings with manufacturer's markings to make them look real.

I emailed Leland's about the three rings but I get the feeling they think I am more of a pain in the neck than someone trying to help them and trying to help fellow collectors.

I sent them pictures of three Braves rings and detailed how the three were different than their offering. All they could say was that they would check it out with their "ring expert". Well they did remove the fake ring today.

I alerted them to two Yankee rings that were made by someone who ring collectors know all too well. These two fake rings, with "Balfour" stampings are not real.

I emailed Leland's with pictures showing the differences and Lelands changed the descriptions of both lots from claiming the rings were "exactly what the players received" to an update that says "This is not an exact duplicate. It varies slightly from those that the players received. This ring was made at a later date. "

Please look at my picture and let me know if you feel I am being too picky, or if you feel Lelands is not acting in the best interest of collectors. I would really appreciate the thoughts of others in our hobby. By the way,although Turner's ring is a '55 and Leland's is a '57, the ring molds on the top of the ring are supposed to be 100% identical.

The differrences between Jim Turner's ring and the Leland's ring:

Jim Turner's real ring has three stars below the stones in the hat. All the fakes made lack these stars. Some of the sellers who sell this junk claim Balfour lost the mold and had to recreate the molds. Balfour would never leave something as significant as stars out. Also, notice how big the faux stones are in the Lelands ring. they do not fit in the ring as nicely as the real ring and the stones in the hat are also poorly placed in the Lelands ring.

Look at the shape of both hats. Turner's is much nicer. Notice the "Y" and the stone in the Leland's ring, they are way too close.

Maybe the Lelands ring is kind of close, but should'nt this be classified as a ring copy and not a real Balfour Ring?

[Peter_Spaeth]

I wonder on what basis Leland's pronounced these rings real in the first instance.

[CW]

Very interesting, sports-rings. You present a compelling case. Your post is
worthy of its own thread, in my opinion.

[2dueces]

Originally Posted by Leon

registered the first day of the new board.......I have the email to prove it


1. Net54Baseball.com Username... Calvindog
2. First & Last name... Peter Chao
3. Daytime ph# (might be called for verification)... 212-xxx-xxxx

How much would a Wagner sell for in a PSA 10?

Sorry Leon, I had to add that one.