Type Collecting?

We have been serious investors in pre WWII type cards since early 1975

When we first entered the hobby our two main contacts were two young teenagers, Bill Mastro and Rob Lifson.They each advised to collect the best examples one could, and that condition
and rarity really matters.

Whilst we had one or two personal setbacks which resulted in the sale of 100+ultra rare typecards- today we have built our collection back up. Of the more than 500 different type cards (different years for 1952-1959 Topps,
and rare regionals) we now have 75% are pre WWII.

In more than 40 cases we own the highest graded example in the set.
More recently we have extended out interest to post cards- and have recently acquired 10 different ultra rare high grade post cards.

Our goal is simple- to build the single best baseball card and baseball postcard collection in the world. We will continue to work every day to meet
this goal.

Please feel free to write us if you have an item for sale or trade.

Thanks


Bruce Dorskind
America's Toughest Want List
bdorskind@dorskindgroup.com

[Bicem]

Nice! Which postcards Bruce?

[rhettyeakley]

I was much more of a type card collector a few years back BUT unlike Leon I was never 100% happy with that approach, but it was fun. However, having been a type guy I was able to channel my collection towards a few sets that I felt had a lot to be researched and discovered so I ended up going for Colgan's, Zeenuts, E121-like cards, etc. So, type collecting for me was more of a starting point than anything else, and I always advocate that approach to anyone that asks as I never knew I really liked certain sets until I actually had some (Zeenuts, T210, T209, etc.), and often I thought I would like a set only to find out they didn't do much for me (M116, E96, etc.)!
-Rhett

[BearBailey]

I've thought the big difference between set collectors and type collectors is OCD vs ADD. Eventually I think you become a bit of both, if you can't find that one or few cards to finish a set, I still find something else to collect.

[M's_Fan]

I'm mainly a sub-set collector: T206 HOFers, T205 HOFers, N162 Baseball players, N28 baseball players, T212 Obak Seattle players, etc.

I always think, "I'm going to finish these sets, and then I'm just going to start a type collection set." And then I get another idea for a great new sub-set.

One thing that discourages me from a type collection pre-war set is that it is so daunting, there are so many cards and many are so rare and expensive ones that it would be an impossible and lifelong pursuit to have a card from each set. But I guess that's the fun of it.

[smtjoy]

I kinda had Rhett's approach, in that i started young as a type collector but then ended up collecting sets of the ones I really liked (exhibits, e93, T210-3etc) and selling the types I really didnt like. I think getting into vintage by working on a type collection is an awesome way to start, getting to see and feel all the different issues is the best.

On the collect what you like front- I have been pretty good about maintaining my focus on my sets but I do allow myself a couple "Ohh thats a cool card" and just buy random cards I like a couple times a year.

[birdman42]

I'm with Joshua--a team collector all the way. Only for me it's Washington rather than the Phil As. I started out intending to be strictly a type collector, but that lasted about a month before I turned to subsets--the T206s and T205s were just too good to have only one.

I've found some really interesting items over the years that wouldn't have interested me a bit if I were going after sets. And us team collectors face a dilemma that set guys don't: What if the name and the picture don't match? Do I go after a "Howard Shanks" 1921 Exhibit that really shows Wally Schang?

I will admit to being a little fuzzy around the edges; I bought a Barney Pelty horizontal T206 just because I think the "Close Encounters" pose is one of the best ever.

My goal at shows (the few I go to) is to complete one subset, and start another. I managed that at the National, completing the 54 Bowmans and starting the Demaree cutouts.

Bill

[toppcat]

I am an inveterate type collector and have been for a while. My main focus is not really apropos here (a run of Topps types sold at retail from 49-80, sports and non sports alike) but I have partially started T and E card runs as well. My main focus is T206 in almost full set form but I really like going after the different types.

I once was going to do a full ACC and beyond type run but that would be impossible. I did create a huge spreadsheet for that purpose that is still floating around the internet (www.oldbaseball.com has a copy) and which I someday hope to really get into shape but I have too many projects going right now.

I just like the idea of all the variety inherent in the method, plus with the Topps stuff I want to document everything as well.