![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Several minutes of my life that I will not be able to get back reading this thread, I reluctantly agree with Leon that the banishment was probably warranted although in a "watercooler" situation, this post was borderline.
Note -- I was later informed that this began on the main boards ----- but I'll repeat because of who the post was about the issue is borderline. However, with Bruce, one of the issues is almost everything he does is borderline so sure enough, one more can be the straw that breaks the camel back Bruce liked to post interesting topics and then "walk away", which is his right. The biggest problem with Bruce's posts is that some of thre responses or emails (I still have one of his classics to me on file as well)became "personal attacks" -- or posts wishing ill on others. In Mr. O's case, you can defend these posts as comments about a celebrity and you would probably win in court although I'm not a lawyer I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. However, the body of work regarding Bruce's posts, e-mails and other issues is probably what drove everyone over the edge. So, regretfully, whilst we will miss his interesting takes on the higher end of the hobby, he needs to walk away and join a group of similarly Ivy-educated high-brow collectors to let us regular folks chat about these musty old cards Regards Rich Last edited by Rich Klein; 11-21-2010 at 06:09 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It seems quite ironic that the Board's ratings have gone down 72% since Bruce's banning.
Just like MSNBC, Leon will soon feel compeled to bring Bruce back just to get his ratings back. ![]() Rob M. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does this also mean that Bruce is not eligible for the Net54 Hall of Fame?
__________________
My collection: http://imageevent.com/vanslykefan |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And, no doubt that at some time in the future I will probably let Brucii back. Not because of ratings (though I guess drama helps) but because I didn't feel this last offense went that overboard. He wouldn't have even got suspended this time had he not copied his lawyer on an email to me, threatening (so it seemed to me and a few others) legal action. After defending his lunacy so much, that just pushed me over the edge. regards
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
could someone still explain the "we" to me?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nope.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What Rob just said. There is no rational explanation.
__________________
Jim Van Brunt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think part of the reason Bruce uses "we" is that it irks people on the board. He seems to get some pleasure out of that. Again, like others I can't explain it- it's just an observation.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() He has a mouse in his pocket ![]()
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
maybe he has multiple personalities or he is giving the voices credit!
__________________
"There is no such thing as over educated! It is better to be quiet and thought of as a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt!! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Massive Baseball Card Collection | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 03-23-2009 05:31 AM |
FS: My entire 1980s Baseball Card Collection! HUGE LOT! PSA/BGS | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-05-2008 02:34 PM |