 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-19-2010, 02:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I'm all for it Leon.
I've said this before (I believe) - grading companies are 'paper graders'. For the most part it seems they ignore the printing quality or the photo quality. It is a shame. Funny to see OJs with terrible photo quality get a high grade - and funny to see other cards with terrible print quality (faded colors / color out of register, etc.) get high grades. I would much rather the image quality (photo or printed) be considered as important as the paper quality. How that would work in a numerical system - I have no idea.
__________________
Joe D. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The first published hobby article, 1935....noted here | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-25-2007 08:43 PM |
| Hobby Retrospect | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-16-2007 10:10 AM |
| PSA discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 103 | 05-11-2005 12:16 PM |
| Objective card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 10-15-2004 09:05 AM |
| New trend on E-Bay? Selling cards rejected by grading services as such. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-27-2004 11:02 AM |
Hybrid Mode
